Friday, November 11, 2011

English Critique

So, a peer review of blogs we have here.

Regan Shuppe

Your blogs represent the classy and funny style of writing we all wish we had. Seriously, the majority of what I read on these blog posts comes from you. When you write, you automatically gather the attention of your audience and pull them in with a funny or articulate statement, whether or not we actually care about the topic.

However, your style of writing can get carried away and mislead. You could even possibly offend somebody, but I would still probably laugh. For example: post 11A starts out with what may seem to be a sarcastic statement regarding the writing process and our progression. I thought it was funny, somebody else, maybe not.

Nelson:

Your blog posts are what i would recommend anyone read right of the bat. Why? Because there fluid and give the reader what they need to know.

Even though you have the first step down, it sounds to generic and original. Its like reading the first article we read on story grammars this semester.

Laycee:

Your blog posts are very basic. You get straight to the point and then its over. There isn't anything wrong about this but neither is there much right.

Like i said before, very basic. Why not elaborate more? Take it to the next step and write about something more intrinsic or extrinsic, giving things the detail they need to, well, stand-out. Just write more basically.

No comments:

Post a Comment